What was once seen as a complement to higher education is now seen as an essential, and few colleges have opted to entirely drop sports programs in recent years. While some aspects of the group's recommendations might have some positive impact, the overall effort seemed to simply reinforce the NCAA's long-held position that student athletes, although treated like employees in a profitable business model, should operate under the NCAA's definition of amateurism and not be afforded established norms around compensation and protections.
It's commendable that the NCAA has paid millions into a fund for in-need athletes to cover clothing purchases, emergency travel and medical expenses. This is a stark contrast to the NCAA's blinded approach to enforcement of such things as recruiting and academic violations.
Education quality control should be enforced more rigorously as well. Don Kusler is national director of Americans for Democratic Action adaction. Refusing to take care of the basic medical needs of college players should not be tolerated. The players have become employees of the universities and conferences as much as students -- employees with no compensation, which not only violates common decency but perhaps even the law.
Where is [all that money] going?
Most profits from college athletics do not go towards academics. College athletics at the highest levels is a profitable entertainment business, and too many athletes sweating and producing for the industry are exploited and undercompensated.
If they graduate in a certain number of years, they have access to this escrow fund with a sum of money in it. Another thing heard from the NCAA is that a new system would be too expensive and too complicated, but when they have to invent a new college football playoff for this season they do it in no time and make a billion dollars out of it.
Briefly, my proposal for paying college athletes is as follows: These commentators have also raised the idea that paying male players but not female ones might be illegal under Title IX, the law that prohibits gender-based discrimination in education.
If a music student goes out in the summer and earns 50 grand, who objects? That's right, football and men's basketball players get paid; lacrosse, field hockey, softball, baseball, soccer players get nothing. The compensation they receive in the form of continued pursuit of their passions and in help with getting a degree is and should be the shining example of a successful system.
But unlike arts departments, college sports programs generate hundreds of millions of dollars for colleges, universities and sports-related industries.
Should college athletes be paid? The NCAA should continue and accelerate efforts to make the academic portion of student-athlete compensation whole.
Under the guise of amateurism, student athletes work long hours each day. College sports is a business — a very lucrative business. Should college athletes be paid? By Caroline Lazarus 3 years ago I believe that college sports as we know them will end.
The plantation workers performing in the arena may only receive those benefits authorized by the overseers. Many of these college athletes are African-American and come from poverty-stricken communities.
InVanskike and his attorneys argued that as a prisoner, he should be paid a federal minimum wage for his work. Recently, the FBI has investigated several athletic programs in which these rules were broken in Division I schools.
Letters to the Editors will be published, but they are subject to revision based on content and length. Nothing about the way hundreds of millions of dollars is distributed is equitable or even fair.
Still, the extent to which college sports is really a fig leaf for a separate, unequal sports league will factor into the Northwestern bid to form a union.
College athletes must be provided medical care whether they make the team or not. All this money is not floating around because of the pursuit of education but because athlete workers produce value.Should college athletes be paid?
Yes: Hard work deserves fair compensation.
The need for money among many budding college athletes and their families as well as the thirst for money among.
Many people say student athletes should receive compensation according to their specific needs because they spend so much time earning their scholarship and have no time to work.
On the other hand, the stronger argument is student athletes should not be able to acquire additional funds in order to help aid them through college. Jan 09, · Former college athletes would be assured health insurance no matter what, relieving the universities of what ought to be their moral responsibility.
Top 10 Reasons College Athletes Should Not Be Paid Collegiate sports are big money makers, at least that’s what most people think, right? The truth is, the only collegiate sports that really make anything for the colleges are football and basketball, and only the top championship teams really.
The popularity — and profitability — of college athletics made the problem of “how to make athletes work for nothing” — or to put it another way, “how to keep the athletes from drawing.
College athletes should be paid for their hard work. Columns Opinion College athletes should be paid for their hard work College athletes should be paid for their hard work By Caroline Lazarus 3 years ago.
I believe that college sports as we know them will end. The opportunity cost for a player to partake in such a flawed system is simply.Download