Although no doubt he was shrewd enough in detecting dishonesty, he seems wherever possible to have believed that other people were acting in good faith and had a better nature through which they could be approached. Written in short lengths for newspaper serialization, the autobiography is not a literary masterpiece, but it is the more impressive because of the commonplaceness of much of its material.
Whether he was also a lovable man, and whether his teachings can have much for those who do not accept the religious beliefs on which they are founded, I have never felt fully certain.
Orwell is not trying to defend Gandhi or his character in his essay. There is an obvious retort to this, but one should be wary about making it. Add Reflections On Gandhi to your own personal library.
Moreover, he was not afflicted by envy or inferiority despite being from a poor family or lacking physical appeal. The Russian masses could only practise civil disobedience if the same idea happened to occur to all of them simultaneously, and even then, to judge by the history of the Ukraine famine, it would make no difference.
It is curious that when he was assassinated, many of his warmest admirers exclaimed sorrowfully that he had lived just long enough to see his life work in ruins, because India was engaged in a civil war which had always been foreseen as one of the byproducts of the transfer of power.
This attitude is perhaps a noble one, but, in the sense which—I think—most people would give to the word, it is inhuman. It is well to be reminded that Gandhi started out with the normal ambitions of a young Indian student and only adopted his extremist opinions by degrees and, in some cases, rather unwillingly.
Are you prepared to see them exterminated? If you are not prepared to take life, you must often be prepared for lives to be lost in some other way.
Strictly speaking, as a Nationalist, he was an enemy, but since in every crisis he would exert himself to prevent violence - which, from the British point of view, meant preventing any effective action whatever - he could be regarded as "our man.
It was also apparent that the British were making use of him, or thought they were making use of him. He could not see another way out of it than world-wide adoption of non violence.
Then the question becomes: The difference somewhere gets to become similar to that between drama and reality. Almost from childhood onwards he had a deep earnestness, an attitude ethical rather than religious, but, until he was about thirty, no very definite sense of direction.
Many people genuinely do not wish to be saints, and it is probable that some who achieve or aspire to sainthood have never felt much temptation to be human beings. He was not one of those saints who are marked out by their phenomenal piety from childhood onwards, nor one of the other kind who forsake the world after sensational debaucheries.
And if, as may happen, India and Britain finally settle down into a decent and friendly relationship, will this be partly because Gandhi, by keeping up his struggle obstinately and without hatred, disinfected the political air?
While most people do not have a genuine desire to be saints, those who possess such desire are not much tempted to be humans.
In this yogi-ridden age, it is too readily assumed that "non-attachment" is not only better than a full acceptance of earthly life, but that the ordinary man only rejects it because it is too difficult: If sexual intercourse must happen, then it should be for the sole purpose of begetting children and presumably at long intervals.
Again, he seems to have been quite free from that maniacal suspiciousness which, as E. I have never been able to feel much liking for Gandhi, but I do not feel sure that as a political thinker he was wrong in the main, nor do I believe that his life was a failure. For instance, it is clear even from the autobiography that his natural physical courage was quite outstanding: It is worth considering the disciplines which Gandhi imposed on himself and which — though he might not insist on every one of his followers observing every detail — he considered indispensable if one wanted to serve either God or humanity.
For such a person, it was difficult to be without friends and even when he was unpopular for fighting for Indians, he had some European friends. Despite those mixed traits in his character, there was hardly one that could be called sinful and for that even his worst critics have admitted him to be a wonderful man whose life was a gift to this world.
They made a good impression on me, which Gandhi himself at that time did not. On the other hand, this was done by a Labour government, and it is certain that a Conservative government, especially a government headed by Churchill, would have acted differently.
And if there is, what is he accomplishing?
He found close friendships dangerous and misleading because the personal bias born of it could lead you into moral wrongdoing. Gandhi himself, for the sake of his health, had to compromise on milk, but seems to have felt this to be a backsliding.
Orwell also finds it true because to love God or the humanity in its entirety, one must not give any one person a particular preference. It is true that the threatened death never actually occurred, and also that Gandhi—with, one gathers, a good deal of moral pressure in the opposite direction—always gave the patient the choice of staying alive at the price of committing a sin: Had Gandhi decontaminated the political environment with his non violent struggle?
They must be interpreted in the right context otherwise a tendency had grown to talk of him as if he were an integral part of the western left-wing movement. In private, the English would admit that he was a man with real influence.Reflections on Gandhi study guide contains a biography of George Orwell, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.
About Reflections on Gandhi Reflections on Gandhi Summary. Reflections on Gandhi: Summary Mahatma Gandhi "Reflection on Gandhi" was an essay written by George Orwell. In this essay he analyse Gandhi's life. The essay is a reflection on Gandhi's life. Orwell tried to understand Gandhi by reading his autobiography called "My Experiments with Truth".
The book impressed him but Gandhi. Orwell’s Reflections on Saint Gandhi Gita V. Pai Department of History Abstract InGeorge Orwell published “Reflections on Gandhi,” in which he offers a posthumous portrait of the Indian independence leader.
My reading of the Before analyzing Orwell’s essay on Gandhi, it will be helpful to recount the. Reflections On Gandhi, a Essay by George Orwell. Saints should always be judged guilty until they are proved innocent, but the tests that have to be applied to them are not, of course, the same in all cases.
George Orwell’s essay “Reflections on Gandhi” examines Gandhi’s principal of non-violence, or Satyagraha ("holding on to the truth"), as a political tool. Orwell attempts to evaluate non-violence as a method of political leverage outside of the unique circumstances in which Gandhi successfully deployed his method.
George Orwell’s essay “Reflections on Gandhi” examines Gandhi’s principal of non-violence, or Satyagraha ("holding on to the truth"), as a political tool. Orwell attempts to evaluate non-violence as a method of political leverage outside of the unique circumstances in which Gandhi .Download